On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:22 AM, C Chauvenet wrote: > Hi all, > > This is an valuable and necessary initiative. > > As I follow the ROLL WG, may I point you to some doc that have been produced > by this WG, and may address some of your questions : > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-roll-protocols-survey-07 : This draft > provide a good survey of several routing protocols (OSPF/IS-IS, OLSRv2, > TBRPF, RIP, AODV, DYMO, DSR) and evaluate each candidate regarding metrics > that are relevant for Low-power and Lossy Networks (LLNs). > I think LLNs are applicable to Homenet networks. > > RFC 5826 : http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5826 ("Home Automation Routing > Requirements in LLNs") : This doc designed by the ROLL WG gather some > requirements regarding routing in Home environments. It may provide good > input for the Homenet WG. > > You may also be interested in the Building version of these requirements, in > RFC5867 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5867. > > I'm not an expert in Home's Networks, and they may have some different > requirements than LLNs that ROLL is looking at. > Please educate me on that point. > But I think we should consider the work that have been done for such > constrained devices.
Thank you for the pointers. The majority of IP-based home networks today are neither power-constrained nor particularly lossy. So, while we can certainly learn from LLN requirements analysis, I do think the base requirements in homenet could turn out to be quite different, or at least a smaller and slightly different subset, of the overall LLN requirements. Certainly, home networks have an emerging IP-based "low power and lossy" component in them. One could even argue that it will become dominant at some time in the future, but that's a leap I personally would be pretty uncomfortable in the group making without some very strong data to back it up. - Mark > > Best regards, > > Cédric. > > > Le 26 sept. 2011 à 21:14, Fred Baker a écrit : > >> I'm trying to do a somewhat complete requirements and pro/con analysis for >> IPv6 routing in a small network, the obvious examples being residential and >> SOHO networks. What I have in pixels at this instant is: >> >> <section title="Contestant protocols"> >> <t></t> >> <section title="Routing Information Protocol"> >> <t></t> >> </section> >> <section title="Open Shortest Path First Routing Protocol"> >> <t></t> >> </section> >> <section title="IS-IS Routing Protocol"> >> <t></t> >> </section> >> <section title="Border Gateway Protocol"> >> <t></t> >> </section> >> <section title="Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks"> >> <t></t> >> </section> >> <section title="Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing"> >> <t> >> Can you say "DYMO"? >> </t> >> </section> >> <section title="Optimized Link State Routing Protocol"> >> <t></t> >> </section> >> </section> >> >> For some of these, the obvious comment is "YMBK". Some will feel that their >> selection is the obvious given and will be able to go on at some length as >> to why, and may be surprised to find that people disagree with them. >> >> I'd like to do several things: >> (a) make the list as reasonably complete as possible consistent with openly >> documented protocols, >> (b) provide a reasonably complete and objective analysis of each as I can, >> (c) identify the key reasons one would choose each - if there is a reason at >> all, and >> (d) identify the key reasons one would not. >> >> What I don't want to accomplish is deep-six these lists and half a dozen >> others in arguments. >> >> Do me a favor. Let's do this in private mail. If you think of a protocol I >> should mention that I haven't, let me know. If you think there is a really >> good argument for or against any of them in particular, let me know. If you >> think I'm nuts - I already know that, you don't need to remind me :-) >> _______________________________________________ >> homenet mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet >> > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
