I noticed there was a new homenet-related draft that talks about the "minimum" physical layout required for homenet-related technology
Have we defined a bounding box around the types of home networking technology we are targeting, or a "maximally complicated" layout that homenet will be able to address with solutions? Thanks! Randy On Mar 2, 2012, at 10:56 PM, Mark Townsley wrote: > > Paris is coming soon, and we want to use the time effectively. Ray and I have > asked the homearch document design team to identify areas in the homenet > architecture document that need discussion time to finish up by end of next > week. My personal thoughts are that two of the most important items we need > to finish off by the end of this next meeting include boundary detection and > what routing protocol we are going to use. Without these, we are going to > have a hard time moving forward at all. > > Post your thoughts on the list, and if you want specific agenda time to talk > about these or other pertinent topics, get your requests into us (including > your ID reference if you have one, and which of the 5 chartered topic-areas > your request most closely aligns with). > > It's time to dive back in. > > - Mark > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
