On 07/30/2012 04:08 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
"Michael" == Michael Thomas <[email protected]> writes:Michael> If we believe that ipv6 is ready to go for mass deployment, why do we Michael> not pressure home router vendors to default to sending router advertisements Michael> with ULA addresses that, if necessary, get NAT'd at the border just like Michael> 192.168 space does today.Michael> I mean, nothing bad would happen, right? Do you mean, NAT64'ed?
Yes, just nat v6 internal addresses to v4 on the isp side when you don't have v6 connectivity. If you're reading this and inclined to a NAT rant, you probably didn't understand my post. Mike _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
