On 07/31/2012 01:00 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 31/07/2012 01:20, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 07/30/2012 05:10 PM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
If you see some advantage that solves the IPv4 address depletion (a
big point of the transition to IPv6 exercise), then I've missed it.
If so, please point out what I missed.
No, not at all and not the point. I'm just of the mind that if
we believe that v6 is really, really ready to go there shouldn't
be any problem in substituting rfc1918 v4 space with v6 ULA
space. If that modest change leads to trouble...
Well, it surely requires a DNS64 resolver in the CPE too.
Having embedded DNS functionality in the CPE is sort of a newish
requirement, yes? If we think that's inevitable for real homenets,
maybe this is a means of moving the ball forward?
Mike
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
