On 07/30/2012 04:37 PM, Erik Kline wrote:
I'm not going to rant until I understand you, thus my question.
How does ULA+NAT64 at the edge replacing RFC1918+NAT44 change the world?
I think it would be a nice thing to do, and it requires no standards
action.
What happens when that customer's ISP eventually gets around to
IPv6-provisioning the customer. If some customer device chooses the wrong
prefix to originate connections we'll be introducing a requirement for NAT66.
You could try to rely on longest prefix matching 3484 behaviour to save you,
but...idk.
As I said, what could go wrong, right? That's sort of the point of
my most modest proposal -- find out sooner rather than later.
Mike
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
