On 31/07/2012 01:20, Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 07/30/2012 05:10 PM, Curtis Villamizar wrote: >> If you see some advantage that solves the IPv4 address depletion (a >> big point of the transition to IPv6 exercise), then I've missed it. >> If so, please point out what I missed. > > No, not at all and not the point. I'm just of the mind that if > we believe that v6 is really, really ready to go there shouldn't > be any problem in substituting rfc1918 v4 space with v6 ULA > space. If that modest change leads to trouble...
Well, it surely requires a DNS64 resolver in the CPE too. Brian _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
