On Jul 30, 2012, at 4:28 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > james> I guess I had hoped the HOMENET group would more easily find > james> consensus around addressing this promptly, but that may have > james> been wishful thinking. > > I am 400% behind you, and if buying you beer will help, tell me.
One of the primary purposes of homenet's scope being what it is, is to help us make some tough calls that might prove impossible in the context of every conceivable network on the planet, but are within reach given the context of a homenet. I'd like to strongly encourage the WG to work towards consensus of what is right for our problem at hand. We will then have to see if it flies in the broader context, but let's try and figure out what we want for the home first. - Mark _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
