On Jul 31, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > Log processing. Maybe, but I think only the customer is really going to care about this, so if they want it to work, they'd be responsible for setting it up.
> It's trivial to secondary a zone. It's even easier when you can have > the forward and reverse zones be the same. No, it's *technically* trivial to secondary a zone. There's a lot of extra business stuff that goes on top of that, plus the problem of dealing with customer brokenness, so it makes sense to charge money to secondary your customers' reverse tree, if you decide to do it at all. Of course it's hard to know how this will play out in practice, but I think it's naive to think that there won't be issues. > So they don't get extra request due to the delegated servers being > unreachable. Giving good answers is cheaper than have to cope with > the effects of the customer's servers being unreachable. Extra SOA or NS requests? Or just customer traffic to a CPE that's not connected? Either way, I think the additional load, if it exists at all, is trivial. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
