The problem of secondarying the reverse zone isn't really discussed in the dns-pd draft, and there are a number of operational details I'd like to flesh out, but the specific question of secondarying the reverse zone isn't quite what it seems.
You secondary a zone so that the contents of the zone will be there when a query happens, but why would a query happen if the CPE device isn't reachable? What would trigger that query? So I think you can get away with _not_ secondarying the zone. But if you do want to secondary it, why would the ISP be responsible for that? Presumably the customer is pretty savvy; a secondary for their reverse tree would just be another service they'd want to buy or set up, and the ISP could wash their hands of it or sell it, whichever they chose. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
