On Nov 8, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Nov 8, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Andrew McGregor <[email protected]> wrote: >> I see no reason not to do this... we'd have to have just about as much >> information to bridge successfully, and a few hundred routes is no big deal.
Is a few hundred enough to meet the present and future homenet requirements? > > +1 > > I realize that I've been arguing for a different solution, but I agree that > this is better. > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
