On Nov 10, 2012, at 2:21 AM, Robert Cragie wrote: > > On 09/11/2012 7:56 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: >> (and that's why RPL isn't on the table at homenet) > <RCC>Why not? Again, the sort of networks which would use RPL (LLNs) are > referred to in the charter.</RCC>
In the charter, LLNs are referred to as an example of a link-layer which might exist in the home and would accordingly require its own routed subnet, not that the entire home itself will be an LLN. - Mark > > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> homenet mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
