On Nov 9, 2012 3:30 PM, "mike" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 11/9/12 3:21 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Thomas <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>      >> An ISP that gives out a single /64 is broken.  As long as we have
>>      >> a way to indicate "out of /64s" (because that could happen, even
>>      >> if you are given a /48, and have some pathology...), then we are
>>      >> good.
>>
>>      Michael> Does that apply to my Android phone too?
>>
>> Are you asking if your Android phone, when it gets only /64 from LTE/3G
>> provider, should hand that out, and then indicate "out of /64s"? Yes.
>>
>> The phone has a pretty clear way to indicate this problem to the user.
>>
> I'm asking about whether I should expect my android phone to get a /56.
> My phone is, after all, capable of being a router. I'm somehow guessing
that
> phone isp's aren't giving out /56's though.
>
>
> Mike
>

This case is looked at in v6ops
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-byrne-v6ops-64share-03

The simple answer is that there is a deployment lag issue. Neither Android
nor the mobile networks support PD today. But they can and will support pd
in time.

CB
_______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to