Op 10 nov. 2012, om 00:30 heeft mike het volgende geschreven: > On 11/9/12 3:21 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: >>>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Thomas <[email protected]> writes: >> >> An ISP that gives out a single /64 is broken. As long as we have >> >> a way to indicate "out of /64s" (because that could happen, even >> >> if you are given a /48, and have some pathology...), then we are >> >> good. >> >> Michael> Does that apply to my Android phone too? >> >> Are you asking if your Android phone, when it gets only /64 from LTE/3G >> provider, should hand that out, and then indicate "out of /64s"? Yes. >> >> The phone has a pretty clear way to indicate this problem to the user. >> > I'm asking about whether I should expect my android phone to get a /56. > My phone is, after all, capable of being a router. I'm somehow guessing that > phone isp's aren't giving out /56's though.
Maybe. Maybe not. My phone supports three tethering interfaces already. My provider supports tethering. No IPv6 yet. Any idea how multi-interface tethering is supported with single /64, without proxy-ND, without translation? We could stop writing how /64 could work, with hacks. Better describe the clean way of doing, and publish lots on bad things that happen with /64 PD to customers. Teco > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
