On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't see how this requirement is different whether you use NPTv6+ULA or >> dynamic global addresses. The only difference that I see is that in the >> case where the machine has a global address, it knows what that address is >> without having to ask a rendezvous server outside the network. In the case >> where it only has ULA, it doesn't know what its address is unless it asks a >> server. >> > > Yes, NPTv6 as I recall begs the question of split resolvers and all of the > ickiness that brings with it. Fred can tell me I'm wrong if I'm wrong. My point was more that that NPTv6 doesn't make that any easier, more secure, or... anything, really. You still have to update the address somewhere; all that NPTv6 gives you is that now the washing machine doesn't know what its IPv6 address is. Right?
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
