On 22 Feb 2013, at 12:37, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > Er, that came out wrong. I'm agreeing with "want to be able to access > devices in the home from away," not "working group was chartered in the last > century."
:) > I am also skeptical about MDNS as a solution, though. <nohat> Personally, I think there's still a good argument to be made for reserving "normal unicast DNS" for access to globally addressable resources (be that from the home to the outside, or from the outside into the home), whilst using "some other protocol" for truly internal name resolution. I *really* don't like the idea of each individual Homenet having to create some sort of randomised namespace for its internal DNS. Ray _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
