Michael asked: > Given happy eyeballs, how will we measure the impact of a v6-only > renumbering?
By a reduction in IPv6 traffic after the event? In any case, to some extent it's a pass/fail test (where "pass" = "no complaints"). Regards Brian On 23/02/2013 08:27, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 23/02/2013 05:53, Erik Kline wrote: > .. >> I wonder if we should ask the NOC about performing a renumbering >> during the next IETF meeting. >> >> Ideally, we should be able to perform one or two (or three) >> renumberings in a week, glean the relevant operational experience, and >> send a draft to v6ops shortly thereafter. > > Great idea. I won't be in Orlando, but I am fairly sure there is nothing > I would do there that cares about address persistency, apart from > having to reconnect to jabber maybe. Conducting an RFC 4192 procedure > on Tuesday night and a flash IPv6 renumbering during Thursday morning > would be very interesting! > > At least Skype will not be a problem during IPv6 renumbering. > > Brian > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
