On 25 Feb 2013, at 22:17, Mark Townsley <[email protected]> wrote > > On Feb 23, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> On 23/02/2013 05:53, Erik Kline wrote: >> .. >>> I wonder if we should ask the NOC about performing a renumbering >>> during the next IETF meeting. >>> >>> Ideally, we should be able to perform one or two (or three) >>> renumberings in a week, glean the relevant operational experience, and >>> send a draft to v6ops shortly thereafter. >> >> Great idea. I won't be in Orlando, but I am fairly sure there is nothing >> I would do there that cares about address persistency, apart from >> having to reconnect to jabber maybe. Conducting an RFC 4192 procedure >> on Tuesday night and a flash IPv6 renumbering during Thursday morning >> would be very interesting! > > We might as well toss in some ULAs as well.
That would be very useful. Renumbering tests have been run ten years ago, with good results for the network elements given there's no 'flag day', but not with ULAs in the mix. So 'flash' renumbering with ULAs in place would be interesting. Tim _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
