> Reading this thread, I perceive big differences in understandings > of the scope of the document (and of the WG). > > IMHO the document (and the WG) are about making the networking layer > (layer 3), and routing, work consistently in zero-management home > networks. That inevitably spills over into DNS. > > The document (and the WG) are not about making the application > eco-system work consistently. That is completely absent from the WG > charter; after all, it's an Internet Area WG. > > I believe the draft meets the charter goals. It's certainly a snapshot, > and should be labelled as such, but it isn't intended to stray much > outside layer 3, and shouldn't. > > Whether work is need in the application eco-system for home networks > is a separate discussion.
FWIW, I agree with Brian. (And I'm speaking as an author and WG participant, not with my AD hat on.) Jari _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
