On 9/20/13 1:49 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Sep 20, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
For the benefit of those of us who weren't in Berlin, can somebody outline what
the relationship is between this group and the (m?)dnsext bof/wg?
Homenet would be an obvious customer for some of the work that's planned to be
done in dnssdext.
What would be nice to know is what Homenet owes the rest of the world on the
naming front. It's always seemed that the naming problem in the charter is sort
of a
redheaded stepchild, and the formation of dnssdext has further muddied the
waters.
If there's really not enough ergs to work on the home naming problem here, that
would
be ok so long as a new group could be spun up when there's enough interest mated
with the ability to follow through. What would really be unhappy is if it were
just an
afterthought; it deserves better than that.
Mike
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
