Le 2014-04-15 07:28, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen a écrit : > Simon Perreault <[email protected]> writes: > >> Correct. But if DHCP or RAs are not filtered at layer 2, a rogue user >> can already do this today without this extension. > > Right, to a certain extent that is true, of course; but not in the same > drive-by fashion where a single packet can put everyone offline (if the > option is not in the regular announcements).
Sure it can. Just send them to a non-existing default gateway. Unless I misunderstood your point. > Would it not be reasonable to add in a requirement that if a client has > already received a DHCPv4 lease (or more generally, has been configured > for IPv4 in some way), it will ignore requests to turn off the stack? I'd be fine with that. Thanks for the idea! Simon -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
