On Apr 15, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Philip Homburg <[email protected]> wrote: > On the other hand, if you need have RAs signal suspend and resume of IPv4 > you are looking at rewriting the management code of lots of different Linux > distibutions (including various embedded ones) and many operating systems.
Yes. That will be a really good outcome. I'm sorry, but I have no sympathy for your protestations about DHCPv4 clients in embedded applications. If it's an RPi, you can run a full-featured DHCPv4/DHCPv6 implementation that works, so there's no excuse for running one that doesn't. If it's a tiny sensor, you want to use 6lowpan anyway, so you're not running DHCPv4 _or_ DHCPv6. And you also always have the option of just ignoring the option if you are implementing something that really is an edge case. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
