On Jun 12, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > That was my problem with other parts of the document: it was *way* too > prescriptive about particular > technologies. That is wrong for the kind of document. That should be hashed > out with actual proposed > answers to the architecture document.
The architecture document was supposed to say what we were trying to build. I think it does a pretty good job of that. "Existing routing protocols" covers a lot of protocols that I think we clearly don't want to use. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
