> I was involved in this discussion I'm genuinely sorry to hear that, Acee.
> the statement was merely an attempt to capture the fact that the > existing unicast IGP routing protocols would meet the homenet > requirements [...] while BGP would not be precluded, BGP's rich routing > policy is not viewed as being required in the homenet. Was it meant to preclude or discourage the following: * route selection involving hysteresis; * radio interference avoidance; * cross-layer metric computation techniques? If it wasn't, then somebody didn't do their homework. If it was, then somebody needs to drop by on this list to explain their position to us. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
