On 06/12/2014 08:27 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Jun 12, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
That was my problem with other parts of the document: it was *way* too
prescriptive about particular
technologies. That is wrong for the kind of document. That should be hashed out
with actual proposed
answers to the architecture document.
The architecture document was supposed to say what we were trying to build. I
think it does a pretty good job of that.
"Existing routing protocols" covers a lot of protocols that I think we clearly
don't want to use.
If they want to get involved in the fight about the thread count of the
toilet bolts, there's
a time and place for that.
Mike
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
