Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > Both of the routing ADs complained about the text in this section. I > do not actually clearly understand their complaints, but after > discussing it with Alia (who did not raise a DISCUSS, but was happy to > talk with me about it) and with Adrian (who really feels quite > discouraged about the whole conversation), the understanding I came > away with was that they felt that the document as written was quite > open-ended and left available the possibility of doing some things that > are Not A Good Idea.
Perhaps the actual fears could be made more explicit. What is it that they are worried homenet might do? -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
pgp0xiCQWun31.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
