See one inline belowŠ

On 9/17/14, 6:40 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On 18/09/2014 02:58, Michael Thomas wrote:
>> On 09/16/2014 11:31 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>>> As was presented in.. err, London?, shared secrets are bad. To really
>>> do this properly, we need device specific keys and some kind of list
>>> of "devices that are allowed to connect", perhaps by having their
>>> public keys in HNCP. I don't know. I am no security expert, but I
>>> believe we probably have to have two or three modes of security, one
>>> being "unsecure" that is auto everything (will give scenarios like the
>>> one Tim wrote about), one that is "shared secret", but where devices
>>> need to be configured using this shared secret (protects against
>>> accidents), and a third one where PKI is used, but where user policy
>>> infrastructure is available. The third one greatly increases scope the
>>> framework required to implement. I'm not sure it would even be HNCP
>>> anymore, perhaps we need a wider view than what the HOMENET charter
>>> has in it currently.
>> 
>> Global symmetric keys certainly have their problems, but using public
>> keys have their own.
>> Namely, if I want to enroll a new device each other currently enrolled
>> device needs to know about
>> the public key of the new enrollee. For 2 devices, that's possibly
>> manageable but for more I really
>> don't want to run around my house looking for every homenet device to
>> enroll the new one.
>> 
>> If we were to do that, it might be nice to have a distributed database
>> of homenet devices such that
>> I only had to enroll it on one of my homenet devices, and then it's
>> distributed to the rest.
>
>I don't think that's a "nice to have". I think it's an unavoidable
>requirement, and it has to require at most trivial human intervention.
>
>(Don't shoot me, but this happens to be a must-have for autonomic
>networking too.)

I¹m not sure that this is a must-have but, if it were, could the autonomic
networking solution be used for homenet?

Thanks,
Acee 



>
>   Brian
>
>_______________________________________________
>homenet mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to