No:
The IPv6 CE router SHOULD be capable of generating a ULA
prefix [RFC4193].
SHOULD, not MUST
-----Original Message-----
From: homenet [mailto:homenet-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2014 17:29
To: Pierre Pfister
Cc: HOMENET Working Group
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfis...@darou.fr> wrote:
> The architecture document states the following: - A home network
> running IPv6 should deploy ULAs alongside its globally unique
> prefix(es) to allow stable communication between devices [...]
Doesn't RFC7084 (6204) already say this?
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6
IoT consulting =-
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
