Initially, the requested "old" prefix did not get nack'd after the expiry date, resulting in an "outage" of around 10 seconds, so approx. 10 secs without v6 connectivity. These days, the old requested / hinted prefix gets nacked by the dhcpv6 server, enforcing new state machine cycle. This works very well.
Regs Carl -----Original Message----- From: homenet [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2014 16:42 To: Gert Doering Cc: Erik Kline; HOMENET Working Group; Pierre Pfister Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !? On Oct 14, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > "flash renumber is a problem" is pretty much a non-argument, as flash > renumbering *will* happen, and devices in the home *will* have to handle it. Indeed. The question is, should we increase the number of instances in which they are forced to handle it, or no? > Carriers do it today - "here's a new /56, have fun", without even > having to reconnect. If this generates phone calls, they may change their minds. It's early days yet. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
