Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote: > [sorry for double-posting, but we need the specific feedback from the HOMENET > community]
> 1. scope
> I finished reading the ANIMA mailing list and, based on the feedback,
Joel,
> Ted, and I would like to clarify the ANIMA scope for "the set of specific
> reusable infrastructure components that support autonomic interactions
> between devices" (quoting the charter)
> The charter currently mentions:
> The ANIMA working group will initially focus on enterprise, ISP networks
> and IoT.
> Multiple tracks were discussed on the mailing list.
> * keep enterprise, ISP networks and IoT
> * focus on enterprise and ISP networks
> * everything, but the initial focus is enterprise and carrier?
> * professionally-managed networks
> It seems to us that "professionally-managed networks" is what ANIMA is
> after. And it's potentially a distraction to try to segment the scope
based
> on enterprise, ISP, homenet, or IoT. What is IoT after all?
(I came to this thread backwards, sorry)
I agree with this change. +1000.
This gets EXACTLY gets to the point.
> 4. Security Advisor.
> I have requested one for ANIMA to the security ADs.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
pgpEzjDqULBF6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
