On 30.10.2014, at 14.00, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 30, 2014, at 5:08 AM, Markus Stenberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> I would personally rather drop prefix management. At least, the current >> proposed solution is DHCPv6 PD plus lot of marketing plus one extra thing >> (role) minus tons of existing functionality. I would rather stick the role >> into PD, than reinvent the protocol. > Hierarchical PD doesn't work or even make sense. Flow-through PD does, but > hasn't been described in an RFC: there is no mechanism for autonomously > configuring the relay structure or installing routes. So I think it's > appropriate to do this work in ANIMA (I know there is no enthusiasm for it in > homenet). Or, if that turns out to be an inadequate solution, to do > something else.
I hope someone tells that to Cablelabs, I thought eRouter spec had hierarchical PD (=hipnet). ANIMA’s current solution[1] does not seem to deal with autonomously configuring the delegation hierarchy, or routes in general at all currently. What does flow-through PD mean? Do you have any reference on that? Cheers, -Markus [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-anima-prefix-management-00 _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
