On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:57:24AM +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > I have thought of this as mostly L3 network. I thought the service > discovery problem between subnets was being solved or had been solved. > >From the discussion here the past few days it's clear to me now that the > mind image of what a future homenet is differs a lot between participants > in this working group.
There are good proposal how to do servicce discovery in homenets or the like with DNS-SD (/mDNS), but i think we should still worry about compatibility with UPnP. Both of these requirements (UPnP and DNS-SD) are IMHO better solved with router-level "proxy" solutions than with ASM IP multicast. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
