On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>
>> So foremost, it would be good to understand if there really is home L2
>> equipment that MUST see MLD to operate correctly. Otherwise i'd happily
>> ignore the problem and say there is enough bandwidth to just NOT DO snooping
>> but have multicast be flooded in the L2 segments.
>
>
> I know of ATA (VoIP) devices with 10/half uplinks that fall over HARD when
> they receive two simultaneous IPTV streams when doing channel switching.
>
> So it's not only about bandwidth, but about how much traffic these kinds of
> devices are designed to receive.
>
> Also, remember that we're going to 4k IPTV streams that might be in the 20
> megabit/s range, and we might be doing multiples of them. All devices on the
> subnet will receive this if there is no MLD/PIM snooping precent.

Is there a formal definition of IPTV? as used here, it seems to imply multicast.

Frankly, until now, I was expecting the world to go to a HAS model for content,
especially big content.

>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet



-- 
Dave Täht

thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to