Agree.  I would not architect around multi-hop multicast, subnet OK,
targeted probably.

Not sure everyone has had the pleasure of running large IP multicast
infrastructures running video, it is a wonderful challenge.
It also has the side benefit of encouraging poorly designed applications.


Interoperability on even core routers for IP multicast barely exists.  In
a home environment, although smaller, will be even less wonderful.

Just the race conditions between PIM and the IGP are always challenging.

On 2/20/15, 1:50 PM, "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> wrote:

>It seems pretty clear that over time, the bulk of video will be unicast,
>in order to meet on-demand needs.  There will always be a few items that
>folks really want to watch live, and thus where multicast may add value.
>  But making multicast the design driver for home networking
>archtiecture seems backwards to me.
>
>Yours,
>Joel
>
>On 2/20/15 1:22 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>>>
>>>> So foremost, it would be good to understand if there really is home L2
>>>> equipment that MUST see MLD to operate correctly. Otherwise i'd
>>>>happily
>>>> ignore the problem and say there is enough bandwidth to just NOT DO
>>>>snooping
>>>> but have multicast be flooded in the L2 segments.
>>>
>>>
>>> I know of ATA (VoIP) devices with 10/half uplinks that fall over HARD
>>>when
>>> they receive two simultaneous IPTV streams when doing channel
>>>switching.
>>>
>>> So it's not only about bandwidth, but about how much traffic these
>>>kinds of
>>> devices are designed to receive.
>>>
>>> Also, remember that we're going to 4k IPTV streams that might be in
>>>the 20
>>> megabit/s range, and we might be doing multiples of them. All devices
>>>on the
>>> subnet will receive this if there is no MLD/PIM snooping precent.
>>
>> Is there a formal definition of IPTV? as used here, it seems to imply
>>multicast.
>>
>> Frankly, until now, I was expecting the world to go to a HAS model for
>>content,
>> especially big content.
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: [email protected]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> homenet mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>>
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>homenet mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to