On Mar 3, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is probably the use case we most care about. I think it's actually a >> strong argument for going with a longer deprecation period. E.g., if your >> deprecation period were three hours, we simply wouldn't have a problem. > > I don't agree with this at all. > > I can easily come up with an equivalent scenario that would require an even > longer overlap in time, for instance a long video conferencing session, and > also there are longer movies than 3 hours.
To be clear, I don't mean that we shouldn't try to improve the situation with renumbering, and I am curious to see the results of your survey. I'm just saying that we also have to accept that change doesn't always happen immediately, and it's worth taking interim steps to avoid breaking existing protocols in obvious ways while also pursuing a long-term strategy of fixing the protocols so that they don't break. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
