Hi Mikael, > As far as I can tell, we have two, of which one is well known in the IETF, > has a working group that is well attended with people from different > organisations, has 20+ implementations total and has 20+ years of experience > and shown extendability, and has multiple extensive commercial testing suites > against which implementations can be validated. > > The other one is experimental, doesn't have a working group, and seems to > have more of a FOSS/Linux style development model with a single "real" > implementation. Some might say this is better than what the IETF does, but > others do not.
Ok, so this discussion is more about following established procedure and about age of the protocol then. Glad to finally see the real arguments on the table :) Cheers, Sander PS: yes, I know I am exaggerating, but we need to break out of this deadlock _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
