On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 07:53:42PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote: >.local has worked
But mostly because ordinary humans never see it. That's what's not clear to me. Is this a name that will mostly be hidden by user-interface sugar (which is mostly how it works with mDNS -- please don't tell me about ssh. That's not our audience, I maintain)? If so, then any domain will do, and putting it under arpa would be fine. Is it a name that we expect people often to use in you-type-it-in contexts? If so, then the story is very different. In any case, I'd really like "translation" to be off the table. We are not competent to do that, and anyway we're specifying a permanent part of infrastructure that will not be able to evolve as (say) language evolves. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
