Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote:
> Michael, the reason to have a consistent name is that the name _will_
> show up in UI elements, and therefore _should_ behave in a
> comprehensible manner. The IETF tends to be understandably dismissive
> of the end-user's capacity to correctly model the functioning of the
> network, but we should not use techniques that deliberately subvert the
> user's ability to make models.I violently agree, but you seem to be saying I missed this. Perhaps you can explain to me what it is that you think I'm suggesting? That's also why I think that it should be possible for the underlying name to be in the native language. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
