Matt, Thanks for the recommendation. i looked at the specs for the AMT and they don't seem to be better that the Shure. The specs for the Audio Technica look better than the Sure. I assume that one would want a flat response and a wide range. I speak from complete ignorance on the subject. The microphones I have bought in the past were purchased because they were on sale. Some I like the sound, some not. How much trust should one put in the specs? I guess, trying them out would be the best approach.
Luke Zyla On May 30, 2010, at 9:45 PM, Matthew B. Smith wrote: > I've heard excellent things about AMT Microphones. The AMT LS would be most > appropriate. That’s a good bit pricey, however, at $564. > > > Another option is the Shure Beta98H. It’s significantly less expensive at > $185, and would probably work fine for this particular use. I use it on the > horns in our rock band, and they certainly don’t hold back, volume-wise. > > > Both could easily become wireless mics, as well. You’d need the appropriate > transmitter (belt pack) and receiver, of course. > > > Let me know upon which mic you decide. Good luck! > > matt > _______________________________________________ post: [email protected] unsubscribe or set options at https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org
