though if i recall they did mention the recording going on hpr briefly, so the
intent was there from the start.
--brian
-------- Original Message --------
On Feb 13, 2020, 07:03, brian via Hpr wrote:
> i do not feel a need to mention hpr within an episode... there is an intro
> and outro. as ken pointed out, it was exclusive and c.c.
> --brian
> -------- Original Message --------
> On Feb 13, 2020, 06:40, Nigel Verity wrote:
>
>> Obviously there are no prizes for guessing the inspiration for this new
>> podcast.
>>
>> Viewed in isolation I am quite happy to give this new podcast a listen and,
>> as a means of getting its existence publicised, HPR is probably a valid
>> medium. The fact that we are discussing it now proves that the principle
>> works. All the same, I think the correct method would be to use an HPR show
>> as a "container", with introductory content by the producers in addition to
>> the podcast itself. I seem to recall at least one precedent for this
>> approach.
>>
>> I would not object to HPR being used in this way for "first editions" of new
>> tech-related podcasts. However if the same approach is attempted for future
>> episodes then I think it should be resisted, otherwise HPR will run the risk
>> of becoming hijacked as a distribution medium.
>>
>> Nige (Beeza)
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> From: Hpr <[email protected]> on behalf of
>> [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> Sent: 13 February 2020 12:40
>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [Hpr] HPR 3009
>>
>> Hello, fellow members of the HPR Community.
>>
>> I'm writting to you today, because I am concerned by episode 3009.
>>
>> This seems to me like a clear case of "syndication" : first the title,
>> "Linux Inlaws S01 E01", and then the fact that there is no mention of HPR at
>> all in the show.
>>
>> I had a discution with Ken about this, and I understand there are
>> circumstances to kind of justify the presence of this show on HPR, but I am
>> concerned that this kind of episode don't really belong - at least in this
>> form - here.
>>
>> With another title, and an a proper acknoledgment on the recording, I would
>> be fine.
>>
>> I am curious to know what the rest of the community thinks, as I'm pretty
>> sure I cannot be the only one to feel this way.
>>
>> Cheers !
>>
>> Yannick.
_______________________________________________
Hpr mailing list
[email protected]
http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org
