On Fri, Aug 19, 2022, 1:39 PM dnt via Hpr <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think we should always keep > the focus on attracting new contributors, it's what sets HPR apart, and > it's the principle that should guide every decision, without exception. > This. This is what the HPR community has defined as success: more contributors, not more listeners, not more episodes per contributor. Granted, more listeners can be a means to that end, but probably not if those listeners "couldn't care less where they get their episodes from". I've enjoyed the handful of the Inlaws' episodes I've listened to, but I think our goals just aren't aligned. If HPR "carried" (as though it were a network) 10 twice-monthly podcasts, there would be no slots left open for new contributors. That's the reason the current policy exists, and we should seek to apply it equitably. I appreciate Ken's offer about aiding in a smooth transition for listeners who have come to Linux Inlaws via HPR, and I hope that sentiment makes the intent clear--this is not a banishment but rather an acknowledgment that you've outgrown us. Struggling to communicate clearly from a French keyboard because I am too lazy to change it, -Laindir >
_______________________________________________ Hpr mailing list [email protected] http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org
