I completely agree. We need more hosts who are part of HPR.

Regards,


-- 
Kevin B. O'Brien
[email protected]
http://google.me/+kevinobrien
http://www.google.com/profiles/Ahuka5656
http://about.me/zwilnik

“People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Governments should be
afraid of their people.” - Alan Moore, V for Vendetta


On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 2:38 PM dnt via Hpr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It's good because with this, no one will be able to question whether
> listeners are your own or HPR's, making any claims of success
> irrefutable. Perhaps you're right that HPR has tended to shy away from
> success in these 17 years.
>
> Jokes aside, I do enjoy your shows and appreciate your work to feature
> guests we want to hear from, so I look forward to subscribing to your
> feed and continuing to listen.
>
> Now for the things pertaining to HPR that we all have talked about here:
> I think considering how easy it is to have your own CC-licensed podcast
> by hosting it on the IA, and how well such a prospective podcaster can
> be expected to host an rss feed to point to the audio files, it seems
> like the only real good reason to slot one's podcast into the HPR feed
> is to access HPR listeners. Then the question for the community should
> be: do you want to sample new podcasts within the HPR feed? For me the
> answer would tend to be no, because again, I think we should always keep
> the focus on attracting new contributors, it's what sets HPR apart, and
> it's the principle that should guide every decision, without exception.
> It's the diversity of voices and experiences and the people who wouldn't
> otherwise be a podcaster. If someone can argue that this would help
> convince listeners to become contributors, then we should talk about it.
>
> For me, a new podcast host or hosts wanting to gain subscribers can send
> a regular HPR show and let us know that if we like their vibe, they've
> started their own podcast we can subscribe to, as Klaatu has done. Those
> who like it will follow.
>
> -dnt
>
> On 8/19/22 00:24, Christoph Zimmermann wrote:
> > Dear community,
> >
> > First of all, the Inlaws would like to thank the HPR community for their 
> > feedback over the
> > years and especially the last few days.
> >
> > Ken is of course right in pointing out the bootstrapping argument in 
> > Wednesday's reply to
> > Yannick's mail (although we never really defined how long this 
> > "bootstrapping" period
> > would last).
> >
> > In addition to the above, the assessment of the situation in our mail from 
> > Wednesday
> > (republished in Ken's mail): the situation from an Inlaws' perspective 
> > hasn't changed
> > since we published our first episode in early 2020. The content is 
> > published exclusively
> > on HPR and our RSS feed points to HPR *only*. Having said that I cannot get 
> > rid of that
> > sinking feeling that HPR and its community shy away from success. If Ken's 
> > analysis
> > published recently [1] is anything to go by, we are one of HPR's most 
> > popular podcasts
> > which regularly publishes content. In addition to the fact that we are 
> > syndicated left,
> > right and center without any involvement of our own (as we found out a 
> > while ago, there's,
> > for example, a Youtube channel republishing the audio content  and giving 
> > HPR credit [2]).
> >
> > But let's take a look at the bigger picture. If our experience never mind 
> > the feedback we
> > are getting through official and other channels are anything to go by,
> > the vast majority of our listeners couldn't care less where they get their 
> > episodes from.
> > They heard or read about the podcast, search for the RSS feed, subscribe to 
> > it and if they
> > like what they hear downloaded from a server, they stick with us.
> >
> > End of story.
> >
> > In this light, any discussion about wording, podcasts vs hosting platforms, 
> > etc. is
> > academic and thus irrelevant for these listeners (playing devil's advocate 
> > for the above
> > of course never mind ignoring bylaws, etc. :-).
> >
> > Of course, bylaws are bylaws and feeling that we may have overstayed our 
> > welcome, we are
> > happy to move the content elsewhere (probably archive.org as suggested by 
> > Ken) which also
> > has the side effect of reducing the technical debt of the corresponding 
> > automation
> > workflow significantly. But do so with a bitter-sweet feeling as we do 
> > believe in the true
> > spirit of FLOSS communities and their welcoming / inclusive attitude, thus 
> > having made
> > every effort to promote HPR and its cause as part of the episodes and 
> > elsewhere. Which is
> > in stark contrast to the wording of some of the comments posted to the HPR 
> > ML over the
> > last couple days.
> >
> > On an interesting side node: HPR seems to be actively soliciting podcasts 
> > from other
> > platforms if, for example, the case of the Grumpy Old Coders is anything to 
> > go by. In its
> > most recent episode [3], David speaks about HPR having reached out to them 
> > trying to move
> > them over to HPR. Given the fact that this format is hosted on a 
> > proprietary platform
> > (Soundcloud) with their format exhibiting far more restrictive aspects (for 
> > example, they
> > publish their content under an "All Rights Reserved" license in contrast to 
> > CC-BY-SA as
> > preferred by HPR) and knowing David (the producer of this format) quite 
> > well as he has
> > been one of my colleagues for the last years, it would surprise me if such 
> > an endeavour
> > would prove to be successful.
> >
> > Never mind the above, the Inlaws would like to thank HPR for having us for 
> > the last 2.5
> > years and wish this platform (our words :-) every possible success for the 
> > future. But it
> > may help in order to avoid similar incidents in the future to be clearer 
> > about syndication
> > never mind what the difference is between a show, a series and a podcast as 
> > far as HPR is
> > concerned (as the wording in [4] is somewhat terse)
> >
> >        Cheers, The Inlaws
> >
> > [1] http://hackerpublicradio.org/eps.php?id=3648
> > [2] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1j_uaAbB3magzPs4Z0Y-mg
> > [3] 
> > https://soundcloud.com/user-498377588/grumpy-old-coders-ep18-rollercaster
> > [4] https://hackerpublicradio.org/stuff_you_need_to_know.php#syndication
> > --
> > This email account is monitored seven days a week.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Hpr mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hpr mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org

_______________________________________________
Hpr mailing list
[email protected]
http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org

Reply via email to