I have a question about optimizing control points in Hugin. Something goes quite wrong. I got Autopano-SIFT to generate many control points. Celeste subsequently removed some points from the clouds. Without optimizing, the control point distance as listed per individual control point in the control point tab looks very good. Hardly ever does it exceed 1 (no more than 10 are over 2); almost all of my approximately 750 control points are less than a pixel off. So that's quite good, I thought.
Then when I optimize, I end up getting very bad results in the optimizer tab. Hugin says that my worst control point is 1900 pixels, and the average around 9 when it starts optimizing and around 5.5 when it's done optimizing. Still, the control point tab shows these low, mostly sub-1 pixel values. Also in the preview window the panorama looks good to me. Previously I did this pano also with manual control points. I noticed that Autopano-SIFT places the CPs roughly where I placed them manually. When I optimize my manual CPs, I end up with an average value of around 0.2 after optimizing. That's a long way from the results with autopano-SIFT's CPs. What explains this discrepancy? Jannes --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
