Jannes Bolten wrote: > I have a question about optimizing control points in Hugin. Something goes > quite wrong. I got Autopano-SIFT to generate many control points. Celeste > subsequently removed some points from the clouds. Without optimizing, the > control point distance as listed per individual control point in the control > point tab looks very good. Hardly ever does it exceed 1 (no more than 10 are > over 2); almost all of my approximately 750 control points are less than a > pixel off. So that's quite good, I thought. > > Then when I optimize, I end up getting very bad results in the optimizer tab. > Hugin says that my worst control point is 1900 pixels, and the average around > 9 when it starts optimizing and around 5.5 when it's done optimizing. Still, > the control point tab shows these low, mostly sub-1 pixel values. Also in the > preview window the panorama looks good to me.
It's easy to visually check this, by using the control point display, sorted by pixel error. BugBear --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
