Bruno, Erik, That was it. Manually deleted the top 2 CPs and results were as expected. Thanks for looking at this.
Jannes ----- Original Message ---- From: Bruno Postle <[email protected]> To: Hugin ptx <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 8, 2009 5:41:36 PM Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Optimizer question On Sun 08-Feb-2009 at 13:23 +0000, Jannes Bolten wrote: > >I have a question about optimizing control points in Hugin. >Something goes quite wrong. I got Autopano-SIFT to generate many >control points. Celeste subsequently removed some points from the >clouds. Without optimizing, the control point distance as listed >per individual control point in the control point tab looks very >good. >Then when I optimize, I end up getting very bad results in the >optimizer tab. Hugin says that my worst control point is 1900 >pixels There is a 'Control Points table' in the 'View' menu which lists all the control points in the project, you can use it to find the 1900 pixel point, delete and reoptimise. I think the problem you are seeing is that the 'bad' control points are connecting images that don't actually overlap, i.e. a pair of images that you didn't consider when you were checking. -- Bruno --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
