On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 09:31:14PM -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> Input converges toward the "single output" equirect proposed by Tom
> (although in the meantime, thanks to the discussion, we know that
> equirect is not enough for all use cases). It's about generating control
> points, pruning them, aligning the images.
In my mind, in hugin the single "output" is the abstraction of a
sphere with certain spherical angles painted with a certain color.
This is represented internally by the source images, their roll, pitch
and yaw parameters and all the other parameters. That's when output
starts.
(If you think of it this way, we do enblend at the wrong point in
time. :-) )
Roger.
--
** [email protected] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement.
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific!
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
