Rogier Wolff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 04:49:20AM -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
>> Rogier Wolff wrote:
>>> (If you think of it this way, we do enblend at the wrong point in
>>> time. :-) )
>> we surely do. enblend is part of my post-processing after I've
>> manually edited the masks on the re-projected layers in Photoshop.
> 
> This is an input-processing step.

no, for me it is not. I use masking to show and hide elements. It's an 
artistic choice and it's part of my *output* processing. Sometimes I 
want to show as many people as possible in a scene. Other times I want 
to mask all of them away. From the same scene.


> Logically you should edit the
> original JPGS to make the unwanted parts "transparent".

this means to me that I would have to run input twice. not very efficient.


> There is a technical problem with that: the jpeg format doesn't
> support that.

my input is mostly TIFF, so I'm not conerned by this technical problem.

The major problems I see with manual masking and for which I want a 
GUI's support are, in order of priority:
1. the ability to see through the layers when deciding what and where to 
mask
2. masking difficult areas - this is projection related (try masking at 
the nadir of an equirect)

both can be solved technically,
1. with a display of overlapping images prior to blending
2. by making this display dynamic and movable

I think we have an underlying misunderstanding about what makes the 
connection between input and output. For you it is a stitched and 
blended panorama. For me it is a bunch of aligned layers.

Yuv

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to