Hullo bruno, On Jan 8, 10:15 am, Bruno Postle <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu 07-Jan-2010 at 13:00 -0800, Terry Duell wrote: > > >My only impatience, if that is how it appeared, was in trying to > >understand whether it was a problem in the trunk or a local problem > >with my build. > >It is a bit curious that others haven't been seeing the problem. > > I noticed that the photometric optimisation result wasn't very good, > but the photos were full of snow, so I'd expect it to not work so > well.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by 'full of snow'. I am not seeing anything that I would describe that way, but perhaps I'm not looking properly. The example images were downscaled so as to not have to provide such a large archive for anyone else to download and test, but the same/ similar result was obtained with the original images. The thing is that the same photos were used for both versions of hugin, and (I thought) with quite different results. Cheers, Terry
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
