Hullo All, On Jan 6, 4:39 pm, Tduell <[email protected]> wrote: [snip]
> Not everything OK here, perhaps it's me! > Photometric optimisation seems a bit crook. Further to this story. A bit of experimenting has revealed a workaround to what I have been experiencing with the current trunk, and this might throw some light on the issue for those that understand these things. If I go through the process of alignment (using 'assistant' tab), then reset exposure, color, vignetting, camera response on all photos and then re-optimise, then select photometrics in fast preview, the resulting stitch appears to be the same as results from hugin 2009.4.0.4742. If I don't do the reset and re-optimise, the color and exposure in the resulting panos are poor. I have tried this approach with two projects and get bad results if I don't reset/re-optimise and good results if I do. Running the same projects through 2009.4.0.4742 and only using 'assistant' steps of 'align' and 'Create panorama' always gives a good result. It might be useful if someone could try to reproduce this using the test images I uploaded (San-G-3.tar.gz). If it's not due to differences between 4742 and current trunk, could someone please provide some guidance as to what might be happening here? Cheers, Terry
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
