Hullo All, On Jan 6, 11:57 am, kevin <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, this fixes the problem for me. So far no offsetting of the > final images. Thanks!
Not everything OK here, perhaps it's me! Photometric optimisation seems a bit crook. I set up a project with some scaled images (to reduce size of package), and ran it through 2009.4.0.4742 and 2010.1.0.4852 (current trunk). I did everything the same for the two versions of hugin, and the result from 4852 is quite a bit different to that from 4742. I have uploaded a tar archive ( San-G-3.tar.gz [1]) which contains the photos, resulting panos and the pto files from the two versions of hugin. The naming should be pretty obvious, everything from 2009.4.0.4742 has 4742 in the name, and similarly for 2010.1.0.4852. If the link below is haywire (I have had some trouble with these in the past) look for the tar archive named above. As others are reporting success with the trunk, it probably points to something at my end, but don't know what that can be. As I say above, I have used the same settings with 4742 and 4852, but the resulting panos don't look alike, and 4742 is much more like what I would consider acceptable. So, either something is still amiss with the trunk, in which case this may help, or something amiss here and hopefully someone can use the uploaded info to set me straight. [1] http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/San-G-3.tar.gz?gsc=7OIBlgsAAABNbhQI4OauOm6prPL6fC32 Cheers, Terry
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
