2010/4/22 Martin Middelhoek <[email protected]> > Hi, > > did some benchmarks on the different versions of enblend. Test case is > a 12000x6000 equirectangular pano, enblend run from the command-line. > > Tiger 32bit: 400 sec. > Leo_SL 32bit openML: hang > Leo_SL 64bit: 335 sec. > Leo_SL 64bit openML: 125 sec. > > The 32bit openML version still has some problems; guess some pointer > arithmetic going astray in 32bit? > > The step form 32 to 64 bit alone increases the speed by only 15%. It > is the openML that makes the real difference on my 4-core system. > > Thanks for testing.
I'm also curious what it will do on dual-core or quad-core G5s or dual-CPU quad-core or 8-core G5s. Also because that's the only architecture I can't test on my Intel. The Rosetta emulation layer only runs 32bit ppc applications. Harry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
